Brick, C., Kahane, G., Wilkinson, D., Caviola, L. and Savulescu, J., (2020), 'Worth living or worth dying? The views of the general public about allowing disabled children to die', Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol: 46(1) [PMC6984061]
Rainey, S., Maslen, H. and Savulescu, J., (2020), 'When Thinking is Doing: Responsibility for BCI-Mediated Action', AJOB Neuroscience, Vol: 11(1): 46-58 [PMC7034530]
Brown, R., Maslen, H. and Savulescu, J., (2019), 'Responsibility, Prudence and Health Promotion', Journal of Public Health, Vol: 41(3): 561–565
Brown, R., (2019), ''Irresponsibly' Infertile? Obesity, Efficiency, and Exclusion from Treatment', Health Care Analysis, Vol: 27(2): 61–76 [PMC6548064]
Brown, R. and Savulescu, J., (2019 ), 'Responsibility in Healthcare Across Time and Agents', Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol: 45(10): 636-644 [PMC6855791]
Davies, B. and Savulescu, J., (2019), 'Solidarity and Responsibility in Health Care', Public Health Ethics, Vol: 12(2): 133-144 [PMC6655468]
Doolabh, K., Caviola, L., Savulescu, J., Selgelid, M. and Wilkinson, D., (2019), 'Is the non-identity problem relevant to public health and policy? An online survey', BMC Medical Ethics, Vol: 20(1): 46 [PMC6612186]
Earp, B. D., Skorburg, J., Everett, J. a. C. and Savulescu, J., (2019), 'Addiction, identity, morality', AJOB Empirical Bioethics, Vol: 10(2): 136-153 [PMC6506907]
Giubilini, A. and Savulescu, J., (2019), 'Vaccination, risks, and freedom: the seat belt analogy', Public Health Ethics, Vol: 12(3): 237-249 [PMC7020768]
Giubilini A, Caviola L, Maslen H, Douglas T, Nussberger Am, Faber N, Vanderslott S, Loving S, Harrison M and J, S., ( 2019 ), 'Nudging Immunity: The Case for Opt Out Vaccination of Children in School and Day Care by Default', HEC Forum, Vol: 31(4): 325-344 [PMC6841646]
Giubilini. A., (2019), 'The Ethics of Vaccination', (Palgrave Macmillan)
Koplin, J., Gyngell, C. and Savulescu, J., (2019), 'Germline Gene Editing and the Precautionary Principle', Bioethics, Vol: 34(1): 49-59 [PMC6972592]
Levy, N., (2019), 'Due Deference to Denialism: Explaining Ordinary People's Rejection of Established Scientific Findings', Synthese, Vol: 196(1): 313–327 [PMC6338713]
Levy, N., (2019), 'Are free will believers nicer people? (Four studies suggest not)', Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol: 10(5): 612–619 [PMC6542011]
Levy, N., (2019), 'Nudge, nudge, wink, wink: Nudging is giving reasons', Ergo, Vol: 6(10) [PMC6774767]
Levy, N., (2019), 'Taking responsibility for responsibility', Public Health Ethics, Vol: 12(2): 103–113 [PMC6655467]
Levy, N., (2019), 'Applying Brown and Savulescu: The Diachronic Condition as Excuse.', Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol: 45(10): 646-647 [PMC6855789]
Milnes, S., Corke, C., Orford, N. R., Bailey, M., Savulescu, J. and Wilkinson, D., (2019 ), 'Patient values informing medical treatment: a pilot community and advance care planning survey', BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, Vol: 9(3) [ PMC6817704]
Savulescu, J., Kahane, G. and Gyngell, C., (2019), 'From public preferences to ethical policy', Nature Human Behaviour, Vol: 3(12): 1241-1243 [comment]
Savulescu, J. and Persson, I., (2019), 'The duty to be morally enhanced', Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, Vol: 28(1): 7-14 [PMC6887531]
Savulescu, J. and Wilkinson, D., (2019), 'Consequentialism and the Law in Medicine'. in in T. C. de Campos, J. Herring and A. M. Phillips., (Eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Medical Law, (OUP) [NBK550265]
Véliz, C., (2019), 'Medical privacy and big data: A further reason in favour of public universal healthcare coverage'. in T. C. d. Campos, J. Herring and A. M. Phillips, (Eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Medical Law, (OUP) [NBK550265]
Véliz, C., Maslen, H., Essman, M., Smith Taillie, L. and Savulescu, J., (2019), 'Sugar, Taxes, and Choice', Hastings Center Report, Vol: 49(6): 22-31 [PMC6916313]
Wilkinson, D. and Savulescu, J., (2019), 'Current controversies and irresolvable disagreement: the case of Vincent Lambert and the role of ‘dissensus’', Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol: 45(10): 631-635 [PMC6855788]
Everett, J. A. C., Savulescu, J., Faber, N. and Crockett, M. J., (2018), 'The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol: 79 (November): 200-216 [PMC6185873]
Giubilini, A., Douglas, T. and Savulescu, J., (2018), 'The Moral Obligation to be Vaccinated: Utilitarianism, Contractualism, and Collective Easy Rescue', Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Vol: 21(4): 547-560 [PMC6267229]
Giubilini, A., Douglas, N., Maslen, H. and Savulescu, J., (2018), 'Quarantine, isolation and the duty of easy rescue in public health', Bioethics, Vol:18(2): 182-189 [PMC6001516]
Giubilini, A. and Levy, N., (2018), 'What in the world is collective responsibility?', Dialectica, Vol: 72(2): 191-217 [PMC6380084]
Kappes, A., Faber, N. S., Kahane, G., Savulescu, J. and Crockett, M. J., (2018), 'Concern for Others Leads to Vicarious Optimism', Psychological Science, Vol: 29(3): 379-389 [PMC5858641]
Levy, N., (2018), 'Addiction: The Belief Oscillation Hypothesis'. in H. Pickard and S. Ahmed, (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Science of Addiction, (Routledge) [NBK540394]
Levy, N., (2018), 'Socializing Responsibility'. in K. Hutchison, C. Mackenzie and M. Oshana, (Eds.), Social Dimensions of Moral Responsibility. (Oxford University Press) NBK513458
Levy, N., (2018), 'Taking responsibility for health in an epistemically polluted environment', Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, Vol: 39(2): 123-141 PMC6105200
Levy, N., (2018), 'Responsibility as an Obstacle to Good Policy: The Case of Lifestyle Related Disease', Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, Vol: 15(3): 459-468 PMC620903
Maslen, H., Cheeran, B., Pugh, J., Pycroft, L., Boccard, S., Prangnell, S., Green, A. L., Fitzgerald, J., Savulescu, J. and Aziz, T., (2018), 'Unexpected Complications of Novel Deep Brain Stimulation Treatments: Ethical Issues and Clinical Recommendations', Neuromodulation, Vol: 21(2): 135-143 [PMC5811790]
Pillutla, V., Savulescu, J. and Maslen, H., (2018), 'Rationing Elective Surgery for Smokers and Obese Patients: Responsibility or Prognosis?', BMC Medical Ethics, Vol: 19(28) [PMC5921973]
Pugh, J., Pycroft, L., Sandberg, A., Aziz, T. and Savulescu, J., (2018), 'Brainjacking in Deep Brain Stimulation, and Autonomy', Ethics and Information Technology, Vol: 20(3): 219-232 [PMC6290799]
Savulescu, J. and Persson, I., (2018), 'The Moral Importance of Reflective Empathy', Neuroethics, Vol: 11(2): 186-193 [PMC5978797]
Savulescu, J., Bambery, B., Douglas, T., Selgelid, M., Maslen, H., Giubilini, A. and Pollard, A., (2018), 'Influenza vaccination strategies should target children', Public Health Ethics, Vol: 11(12): 221-234 [PMC6093440]
Shepherd, J., (2018), 'Consciousness and Moral Status', (Routledge) [NBK540410]
Wagner, K., Maslen, H., Oakley, J. and Savulescu, J., (2018), 'Would you be willing to zap your child's brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation', AJOB Empirical Bioethics, Vol: 9(1): 29-38 [PMC6068541]
Wilkinson, D. and Savulescu, J., (2018), 'Ethics, Conflict and Medical Treatment for Children: From disagreement to dissensus' (Elsevier) [NBK537987]
Wilkinson, D. Petrou, S. and Savulescu, J., (2018), 'Expensive care? Resource-based thresholds for potentially inappropriate treatment in intensive care', Monash Bioethics Review, Vol: 35(1-4), pp 2-23 [PMC6096869]
Wilkinson, D. and Savulescu, J., (2018), 'Cost equivalence and pluralism in publicly funded health care systems', Health Care Analysis, Vol: 26(4): 287–309 [PMC6208988]
Douglas, T., Pugh, J., Singh, I., Savulescu, J. and Fazel, S., (2017), 'Risk Assessment Tools in Criminal Justice and Forensic Psychiatry: The Need for Better Data', European Psychiatry, Vol: 42(May): 134–137.
Douglas, T., Earp, B. D. and Savulescu, J., (2017), 'Moral Neuroenhancement'. in K. Rommelfanger and L. Johnson, (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics, (Routledge) [NBK493126]
Giubilini, A., Savulescu, J., Douglas, T., Birkl, P. and Maslen, H., (2017), 'Taxing Meat: Taking Responsibility for One’s Contribution to Antibiotic Resistance', Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol: 30(2): 179-198 [PMC5837014]
Gyngell, C., Savulescu, J. and Douglas, T., (2017), 'The ethics of germline gene editing', Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol: 34(4): 498–513 [PMC5573992]
Levy, N., (2017), 'Nudges in a post-truth world', Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol: 43(8): 495-500.
Lowe, G., J. Pugh, G. Kahane, L. Corben, S. Lewis, M. Delatycki and J. Savulescu, (2017). 'How should we deal with misattributed paternity? A survey of lay public attitudes', AJOB Empirical Bioethics Vol:8(4): 234-242 [PMC5849225]
Persson, I. and Savulescu, J., (2017), 'Moral Hard-Wiring and Moral Enhancement', Bioethics, Vol: 31(4): 286-295.
Pugh, J., Maslen, H. and Savulescu, J., (2017), 'Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value', Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Vol: 26(4): 640-657.
Savulescu, J. and Schaefer, G. O., (2017), 'Better Minds, Better Morals: A Procedural Guide to Better Judgment', Journal of Posthuman Studies, Vol: 1(1): 26-43.
Savulescu, J. and Schuklenk, U., (2017), 'Doctors Have No Right to Refuse Medical Assistance in Dying, Abortion or Contraception', Bioethics, Vol: 31(3): 162–170
Wilkinson, D. and Nair, T., (2017), 'Settling for second best: when should doctors agree to parental demands for suboptimal medical treatment?', Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol: 43(12): 831-840 [PMC5827708]
Arora, C., Savulescu, J., Maslen, H., Selgelid, M. and Wilkinson, D., (2016), 'The Intensive Care Lifeboat: a survey of lay attitudes to rationing dilemmas in neonatal intensive care', BMC Medical Ethics, Vol: 17(1): 69.
Persson, I. and Savulescu, J., (2016), 'Moral Bioenhancement, Freedom and Reason', Neuroethics, Vol: 9(3): 263-268.
Porsdam- Mann, S., J, S. B. and Savulescu, J., (2016), 'Facilitating the ethical use of health data for the benefit of society: Electronic health records, consent and the duty of easy rescue', Philosophical Transactions A, Vol: 374(2083)(2083).
Pugh, J., Kahane, G. and Savulescu, J., (2016), 'Partiality for Humanity and Enhancement'. in S. Clarke, J. Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, A. Giubilini and S. Sanyal, (Eds.) The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate. (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Roache, R. and Savulescu, J., (2016), 'Enhancing Conservatism'. in S. Clarke, J. Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, A. Giubilini and S. Sanyal, (Eds.) The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Savulescu, J., (2016), 'Concise argument—wellbeing, collective responsibility and ethical capitalism', Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol: 42(6): 331-333. [freely available]
Snoek, A., Levy, N. and Kennett, J., (2016), 'Strong-willed but not successful: The importance of strategies in recovery from addiction', Addictive Behaviors Reports, Vol: 4: 102-107.
Wilkinson, D., De Crespigny, L., Skene, L. and Savulescu, J., (2016), 'Protecting Future Children from In-Utero Harm', Bioethics, Vol: 30(6): 425-432.
Disease caused by lifestyle is a pressing public health issue. Rising costs from health conditions that seem to be partly due to individual behaviour make issues of resource allocation a priority. Some people think that the right response is to direct resources to those who are not responsible for their disease, at the cost of those who are. Such proposals raise many issues. While resources are limited, the NHS is based on a principle of equal treatment for equal need. Is it right to disrupt this principle in the name of cost-saving?
Philosophers, psychologists and neuroscientists have also raised questions about the idea of freedom that underpins claims of responsibility, and of our ability to tell when people are responsible for their health. When our choices are shaped by our genes, upbringing and the broader social environment, does it even make sense to hold people responsible for their health? Or will we simply end up focusing on already stigmatised groups who need our support rather than our condemnation? Some have suggested that an inability to take responsibility is itself a health issue. In the future, we might try to enhance patients’ ability to take responsibility, strengthening their capacity for sticking to commitments and exercising willpower.
Issues of responsibility also apply beyond the question of resource rationing. Holding patients responsible might be seen as a natural partner to respecting patient autonomy. But some people think that there are limits to how far autonomy should be respected in a health care service. Patients sometimes want treatments that are harmful or unnecessary, or refuse treatments that generate considerable public good at little personal cost. Must society really respect such choices in all cases?
Medical professionals also have responsibilities and rights. How should doctors, nurses and other caregivers behave when they object to providing a treatment on moral grounds?How should society and the healthcare system treat them?
These pressing issues, among others, are the subject of this series of podcasts. The series is part of a broader project, funded by the Wellcome Trust and led by Professor Julian Savulescu, on Responsibility and Health Care.
Should obese people be held responsible for being overweight? (Released 10 June 2019)
Suppose an obese person requires a hospital procedure for a condition that is in part linked to their obesity. Many people might believe that a patient must bear responsibility for being overweight. And, other things being equal, that's a reason to prioritize the needs of another patient first. So is the concept of responsibility a useful one in determining how to distribute health resources. Becky Brown is not convinced.
Becky Brown is a philosopher at Oxford's Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford. Becky's work focuses on the ethics of health promotion, particularly questions about responsibility for unhealthy behaviour. This research involves considering how philosophical theories can be informed by evidence from the social and medical sciences and vice versa. Ultimately, the aim of this work is to better understand what kinds of approaches to encouraging healthy behaviour are justified.
Should patient autonomy always be respected? (Released 24 June 2019)
A fundamental value of modern medicine is patient autonomy. Doctors should not insist upon a medical procedure or impose a procedure on a patient. The patient's consent - or the consent of a parent or guardian - needs to be obtained. But are there any exceptions to this basic principle. Alberto Giubilini argues that there are....
Alberto Giubilini is a Research Fellow at the University of Oxford, working on the Oxford Martin Programme on Collective Responsibility for Infectious Disease. He is based at the Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics and at the Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities. He has a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Milan, and prior to joining Oxford he worked in Australia at Monash University, University of Melbourne and Charles Sturt University. He has published on different topics in bioethics and philosophy, including a recent on The Ethics of Vaccination (Palgrave MacMillan 2019).
Responsibility and Addiction (Released 8 July 2019)
Normally, when we say that somebody is addicted to a substance, like a drug, we believe it is because they have lost control - they don't have the ability to resist their desire for it - even if they at some level still believe it is harmful to them. And to some extent, we are inclined to say, they are no longer responsible for surrendering to this desire. But Neil Levy says science should force us to reconsider the link between control, responsibility and belief.
Neil Levy is Professor of Philosophy at Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, and a Senior Research Fellow at Oxford's Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford.
What is the link between responsibility and effort? (Released 22 July 2019)
Compare the athlete who finds training really tough but does it anyway, with the athlete who takes a substance that makes training easier. We tend to think that people who strain hard to achieve their goals are more deserving of praise than those for whom it is effortless, or who take advantage of shortcuts. Hannah Maslen believes this intuition is mistaken.
Hannah Maslen is the Deputy Director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford. Hannah works on a wide range of topics in applied philosophy, from neuroethics, to moral emotions and criminal justice. Hannah is currently the Editor-in-Chief for the journal Neuroethics.
Doctors and their conscience! (Release date 5 August 2019)
Should doctors be allowed to deny a medical procedure to patients on grounds of conscience? Some doctors believe abortion to be wrong. Should they be permitted to turn away a woman who wants a legal abortion? Dominic Wilkinson is both a philosopher and a physician.
Dominic Wilkinson is Director of Medical Ethics and Professor of Medical Ethics at Oxford's Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, UK. He is a consultant in newborn intensive care at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, holds a health practitioner research fellowship with the Wellcome Trust, and is a senior research fellow at Jesus College Oxford.
Responsibility and Justice (Release date 19 August 2019)
If two people have a medical condition that requires treatment and John is responsible for having the condition, but Janet is not, then some people believe that Janet should take priority. Janet should be treated first. But benefiting Janet in this way only really makes sense if we are first clear what we mean by John being ‘responsible’ for his condition.
Ben Davies is a postdoctoral research fellow on Professor Julian Savulescu's Wellcome Trust project on the relevance of personal responsibility to healthcare policy. His primary research focus is on issues in medical resource allocation. He completed his PhD at King's College London in 2015, working on ethical issues related to enhancements targeting human ageing.
Interviews by David Edmonds (OUC Distinguished Research Fellow & Consultant Researcher).
The podcast series is a collaboration between Philosophy 24/7 and the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics.
Philosophy 24/7 brings you concise interviews with leading philosophers about pressing moral, political and social questions and is hosted by David Edmonds, a multi-awarding winning BBC journalist, and one half of the duo behind the Philosophy Bites podcast.
We are grateful to the Wellcome Trust for funding the project.